Identity & access
Workspace isolation, role-based access and MFA capability for privileged roles.
Enterprise tender & public procurement intelligence
Every tender claim should carry its evidence.
BidSmith ASF connects requirements, evidence, claims, approvals and AI activity in one controlled procurement record—built for scrutiny, not black-box automation.
Evidence-first controls Human approval retained Tamper-evident records
Policy registry
PPN 02/24
Designed to hold PPN 02/24 and PPN 017 profiles.
Legislative alignment
Procurement Act 2023
Terminology and effective-date aware policy control.
Maker–checker
Human authority
A named human remains accountable for approval.
Interactive showcase
Trace the answer back to the source.
Select a control layer to see how BidSmith turns a complex tender into a defensible, reviewable work product.
Control layer 01 Trace active
Turn every tender clause into a controlled requirement.
Register questions, mandatory requirements, award criteria, deadlines and obligations—each linked to its document version, page and source excerpt.
Control status
Source-linked
Record includes
Dependencies · conflicts · lifecycle states
System architecture
Control is designed into every layer.
A modular core keeps procurement work coherent while isolated services handle document parsing and controlled AI workloads.
Tender control core
Projects, requirements, evidence, claims, reviews and policy profiles.
Governed model gateway
Server-side model access with identity, purpose, limits and a global kill switch.
Audit & assurance
Append-only events, cryptographic hashes, manifests and human attestations.
Fail-closed foundation
If identity, policy, audit or approval dependencies fail, the protected action does not proceed.
Human governance
AI has a role. A person has authority.
Every production AI deployment is intended to have an identity, exact model record, permitted tools, service period and accountable human owner.
No AI self-approval
No autonomous tender submission
No silent evidence replacement
No unsupported material claim
Maker–checker decision record
01
AI proposal
Drafted from approved evidence
02
Maker review
Claim and citation checked
03
Checker approval
Independent named approval
04
Manual export
Released by an authorised human
Assured delivery path
Four controlled phases. One accountable system.
Each phase has a working-product exit condition—not simply a design-document milestone.
Secure foundation
Identity, workspace isolation, role control and immutable audit events.
Auditable tender core
Secure intake, requirements, evidence, claims, review and manual export.
Controlled AI workforce
Governed AI identities, exact model traceability and evidence-bounded drafting.
Assured private release
Independent verification, recovery, monitoring and a verifiable assurance bundle.
Why BidSmith ASF
Move from fragmented files to a defensible procurement record.
| Control area | Conventional tender tooling | BidSmith ASF |
|---|---|---|
| Requirements | Tracked across documents and spreadsheets | Linked graph with source location and lifecycle |
| Claims | Wording detached from supporting records | Claim-to-evidence links and named review |
| AI activity | Provider output with limited operational trace | Named deployment, model, policy, tools and outcome |
| Approval | Implicit status or shared ownership | Maker–checker with independent human authority |
| Audit | Activity logs assembled after the event | Append-only events and integrity hashes |
| Final output | Response files without assurance context | Locked pack with manifests, approvals and exceptions |
Enterprise demonstration
See an evidence-first tender workflow in practice.
Walk through requirement mapping, evidence controls, claim review and the final assurance bundle with your procurement, bid and risk teams.
Suitable for
Public-sector suppliers · regulated enterprises · bid assurance teams · procurement leaders